nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

08.02.2019 | Research Paper

Human Capital Endowments and Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being in Chile

verfasst von: Javier G. Boncompte, Ricardo D. Paredes

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We study the gender life satisfaction gap by using a non-linear version of the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition to isolate the effect of human capital inequalities among men and women in Chile, a country with one of the lowest female labor force participation in the world. We test gender bias hypotheses through the way each individual values their own income in relation to their partner’s. We provide evidence the gender life satisfaction gap favoring men can be more than fully explained by the differences in endowments (e.g., income and education). Nonetheless, there are structural disparities in the way men and women value their endowments, especially their income and labor status. Regarding the partner’s income, we found personal income is always more valued than the partners, and that this difference is higher in the case of men. Finally, we find differences in the valuation of being out of the labor force. We interpret these findings as consequence of a high degree of sexism prevailing in Chile, which masks the full effect of material inequalities in people’s lives.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The World Values Survey, the Happy Planet Index (HPI), and the UNDP's Human Development Index are the most recognized worldwide surveys used to get indicators of individuals' subjective well-being (SWB).

Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Frijters (2004) analyze the theoretical and practical implications of this and alternative methodologies, finding few differences in the numbers but indeed some in the interpretation of the coefficients and the model’s assumptions.

We could have also assumed a logistic distribution and thus use an ordered logit model. The results did not differ under each specification, in line with the results reported by Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Frijters (2004).

The complete tables of average marginal effects for all three specifications are available in Appendix 1.

The “Parallel Lines” assumption was rejected for most variables and therefore traditional ordinal models are not suitable for analyzing our data. However, for purposes of comparison with our GO average marginal effects, we present the biased estimates from an ordinal probit model in Appendix 2.

Bauer's and Sinning's (2008) decomposition depends on choosing a reference group for valuation and endowments effects. When changing the reference group from women to men, coefficients differences continue to narrow the gap caused by disparities in gender's endowments but are less effective doing so.

Ahn, N., Ateca-Amestoy, V., & Ugidos, A. (2013). Financial satisfaction from an intra-household perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies,15, 1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9466-3.CrossRef

Arrosa, M. L., & Gandelman, N. (2016). Happiness decomposition: Female optimism. Journal of Happiness Studies,17, 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9618-8.CrossRef

Bauer, T. K., & Sinning, M. (2008). An extension of the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition to nonlinear models. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis,92, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-008-0056-3.CrossRef

Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy,81, 813–846. https://doi.org/10.1086/260287.CrossRef

Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy,82, S11–S26. https://doi.org/10.1086/260287.CrossRef

Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Benjamin, D. J., Kimball, M. S., & Rees-Jones, A. (2012). What do you think would make you happier? What do you think you would choose? American Economic Review, 102(5), 2083–2110.CrossRef

Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics,88, 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8.CrossRef

Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources,8, 436–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/144855.CrossRef

Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., et al. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research,100, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2.CrossRef

Bonke, J. (2008). Income distribution and financial satisfaction between spouses in Europe. Journal of Socio-Economics,37, 2291–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.12.006.CrossRef

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

CASEN. (2011). Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional. Chile: Ministerio Desarrollo Social.

Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.CrossRef

de Dios Ortúzar, J., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling transport. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef

Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,100, 11176–11183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633144100.CrossRef

Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research,65, 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003801.89195.bc.CrossRef

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?*. Economic Journal,114, 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x.CrossRef

Fleurbaey, M., Schokkaert, E., & Decancq, K. (2009). What good is happiness?. Wilrijk: CORE.

Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(3), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.427.CrossRef

Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: Vintage Books.

Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2013). Gender and well-being around the world. International Journal of Happiness and Development,1, 212. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHD.2013.055648.CrossRef

Hansson, A., Hillerås, P., & Forsell, Y. (2005). Well-being in an adult Swedish population. Social Indicators Research,74, 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6168-6.CrossRef

Horowitz, J. (1982). Specification tests for probabilistic choice models. Transportation Research Part A: General,16, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(82)90066-8.CrossRef

INE. (2015). Mujeres en Chile y Mercado del Trabajo. Participación laboral femenina y brechas salariales. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.

Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.

Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (Revised ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRef

Long, S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). New York: Stata Press.

Murray, M. (2015). Back to work? Childcare negotiations and intensive mothering in Santiago de Chile. Journal of Family Issues,36, 1171–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14533543.CrossRef

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. L. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 330–350). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–Female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review (Philadelphia),14, 693. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981.CrossRef

Oswald, A. J. (2008). On the curvature of the reporting function from objective reality to subjective feelings. Economic Letters,100, 369–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.02.032.CrossRef

Paredes, R., & Riveros, L. (1994). Gender wage gaps in Chile: A long term view. In A. Van Adams, R. Paredes & L. Riveros (Eds.), Estudios de Economía, Special Issue on Labor Markets, October.

Shmotkin, D. (1990). Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social Indicators Research,23, 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293643.CrossRef

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2008, 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0001.CrossRef

Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? Journal of Socio-Economics,35, 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.043.CrossRef

Tanton, R., Mohanty, I., & Hogan, A. (2012). Reasons for homeostatic failure in subjective wellbeing. NATSEM Working Paper 12/18. Canberra, Australia: University of Canberra.

Tesch-Römer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2007). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research,85, 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9133-3.CrossRef

Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies,12, 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5.CrossRef

Vieira Lima, S. (2014). Essays on economics and happiness. Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca. https://boa.unimib.it/handle/10281/51986?mode=full.9.

Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal,6, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0600600104.CrossRef

Wilson, C. M., & Oswald, A. J. (2005). How does marriage affect physical and psychological health? A survey of the longitudinal evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1619. https://ssrn.com/abstract=735205.

Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica,65, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00111.CrossRef

Zweig, J. S. (2015). Are women happier than men? Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Happiness Studies,16, 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9521-8.CrossRef

Titel: Human Capital Endowments and Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being in Chile
verfasst von: Javier G. Boncompte
Ricardo D. Paredes
Publikationsdatum: 08.02.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00085-y