nach oben

Journal of Materials Science

16.05.2024 | Computation & theory

Computational screening of metal–organic frameworks for separation of CO₂ and N₂ from wet flue gas

verfasst von: Chengxin Ji, Kang Zhang

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In response to the challenging task of effecting CO₂ and N₂ adsorption separation under humid gas conditions, this study employs a methodology that integrates molecular simulation with high-throughput screening. The focus is on investigating the adsorption separation of a ternary mixture (CO₂/N₂/H₂O) utilizing the most recent experimental synthesis of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) from the CoRE-MOF-2019 database. To circumvent the competitive adsorption of water vapor, materials with excessive hydrophilicity are systematically excluded. Subsequently, a univariate analysis is conducted on the remaining 1343 MOFs, exploring the intricate relationships between key structural parameters such as pore limiting diameter, maximum pore cavity diameter of free channels (LCD), pore volume (V_pore), volume surface area (VSA), weight surface area, density (ρ), porosity (φ), Henry coefficient (K), adsorption heat (\(Q_{{{\text{st}}}}^{0}\)), and metal types. The investigation reveals positive correlations between ρ, K, and \(Q_{{{\text{st}}}}^{0}\) with selectivity, while other descriptors exhibit negative correlations. Notably, MOFs enriched with Cd and Cu demonstrate superior performance. Subsequent analysis employs Pearson coefficients and a decision tree model to rank descriptors and identify the top three descriptors (LCD, VSA, and \(Q_{{{\text{st}}}}^{0}\)) influencing performance. Utilizing these descriptors, the decision tree model delineates optimal design criteria: \(Q_{{{\text{st}}}}^{0}\) > 28.296 kJ mol⁻¹, LCD < 5.893 Å, and VSA > 727.596 m² cm⁻³. To predict the performance of MOFs that have not yet been synthesized or experimentally validated, we employed the nine descriptors for model training and out-of-sample validation. The decision tree classifier exhibits high prediction accuracy and shows excellent transferability, effectively delineating the boundaries between different performance classes by capturing structural–selectivity correlations. This process culminates in the screening of 15 optimal MOFs, offering theoretical insights for the adsorption separation of CO₂ in humid flue gas.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bae Y, Snurr RQ (2011) Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:11586–11596. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101891CrossRef

Xiang S, He Y, Zhang Z et al (2012) Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions. Nat Commun 3:954. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1956CrossRefPubMed

Koizumi K, Nobusada K, Boero M (2019) Hydrogen storage mechanism and diffusion in metal–organic frameworks. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:7756–7764. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP07467DCrossRefPubMed

Rosi NL, Eckert J, Eddaoudi M et al (2003) Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 300:1127–1129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083440CrossRefPubMed

DeCoste JB, Weston MH, Fuller PE et al (2014) Metal-organic frameworks for oxygen storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:14092–14095. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201408464CrossRef

Düren T, Sarkisov L, Yaghi OM, Snurr RQ (2004) Design of new materials for methane storage. Langmuir 20:2683–2689. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0355500CrossRefPubMed

Zhao X, Wang Y, Li D et al (2018) Metal-organic frameworks for separation. Adv Mater 30:1705189. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705189CrossRef

Li J-R, Sculley J, Zhou H-C (2012) Metal-organic frameworks for separations. Chem Rev 112:869–932. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200190sCrossRefPubMed

Chen L, Xu Q (2019) Metal-organic framework composites for catalysis. Matter 1:57–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.018CrossRef

10.

Lee J, Farha OK, Roberts J et al (2009) Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 38:1450. https://doi.org/10.1039/b807080fCrossRefPubMed

11.

Jiao L, Wang Y, Jiang H, Xu Q (2018) Metal-organic frameworks as platforms for catalytic applications. Adv Mater 30:1703663. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703663CrossRef

12.

Orellana-Tavra C, Marshall RJ, Baxter EF et al (2016) Drug delivery and controlled release from biocompatible metal–organic frameworks using mechanical amorphization. J Mater Chem B 4:7697–7707. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB02025ACrossRefPubMed

13.

Bernini MC, Fairen-Jimenez D, Pasinetti M et al (2014) Screening of bio-compatible metal–organic frameworks as potential drug carriers using Monte Carlo simulations. J Mater Chem B 2:766–774. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB21328ECrossRefPubMed

14.

Wang X, Nakamoto T, Dulińska-Molak I et al (2016) Regulating the stemness of mesenchymal stem cells by tuning micropattern features. J Mater Chem B 4:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB02215KCrossRefPubMed

15.

Lustig WP, Mukherjee S, Rudd ND et al (2017) Metal–organic frameworks: functional luminescent and photonic materials for sensing applications. Chem Soc Rev 46:3242–3285. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00930ACrossRefPubMed

16.

Campbell MG, Liu SF, Swager TM, Dincă M (2015) Chemiresistive sensor arrays from conductive 2D metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 137:13780–13783. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b09600CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kreno LE, Leong K, Farha OK et al (2012) Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem Rev 112:1105–1125. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200324tCrossRefPubMed

18.

Kadri E, Dhahri K, Zaafouri A et al (2017) Ac conductivity and dielectric behavior of a−Si: H/c−Si_1−y Ge_y/p−Si thin films synthesized by molecular beam epitaxial method. J Alloys Compd 705:708–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.117CrossRef

19.

Rasheed M, Mohammed OY, Shihab S, Al-Adili A (2021) Explicit numerical model of solar cells to determine current and voltage. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 1795, p 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/012043

20.

Enneffatia M, Rasheed M, Louatia B et al (2021) Investigation of structural, morphology, optical properties and electrical transport conduction of Li_0.25 Na_0.75 CdVO₄ compound. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 1795, p 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/012050

21.

Kadri E, Messaoudi O, Krichen M et al (2017) Optical and electrical properties of SiGe/Si solar cell heterostructures: ellipsometric study. J Alloy Compd 721:779–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.025CrossRef

22.

Phan A, Doonan CJ, Uribe-Romo FJ et al (2010) Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Acc Chem Res 43:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900116gCrossRefPubMed

23.

Britt D, Furukawa H, Wang B et al (2009) Highly efficient separation of carbon dioxide by a metal-organic framework replete with open metal sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20637–20640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909718106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Banerjee R, Furukawa H, Britt D et al (2009) Control of pore size and functionality in isoreticular zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and their carbon dioxide selective capture properties. J Am Chem Soc 131:3875–3877. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja809459eCrossRefPubMed

25.

Kaye SS, Dailly A, Yaghi OM, Long JR (2007) Impact of preparation and handling on the hydrogen storage properties of Zn₄ O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)₃ (MOF-5). J Am Chem Soc 129:14176–14177. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja076877gCrossRefPubMed

26.

Zhou Q, Luo D, Hua D et al (2022) Design and characterization of metallic glass/graphene multilayer with excellent nanowear properties. Friction 10:1913–1926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-021-0581-6CrossRef

27.

Hua D, Zhou Q, Shi Y et al (2023) Revealing the deformation mechanisms of 〈110〉 symmetric tilt grain boundaries in CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy. Int J Plast 171:103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103832CrossRef

28.

Ren Y, Zhou Q, Hua D et al (2024) Wear-resistant CoCrNi multi-principal element alloy at cryogenic temperature. Sci Bull 69:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.12.003CrossRef

29.

Ben Azaza N, Elleuch S, Rasheed M et al (2019) 3-(p-nitrophenyl)Coumarin derivatives: synthesis, linear and nonlinear optical properties. Opt Mater 96:109328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109328CrossRef

30.

Colón YJ, Snurr RQ (2014) High-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 43:5735–5749. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00070FCrossRefPubMed

31.

Qiao Z, Zhang K, Jiang J (2016) In silico screening of 4764 computation-ready, experimental metal–organic frameworks for CO₂ separation. J Mater Chem A 4:2105–2114. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA08984KCrossRef

32.

Demir H, Keskin S (2022) Hypothetical yet effective: computational identification of high-performing MOFs for CO₂ capture. Comput Chem Eng 160:107705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107705CrossRef

33.

Qiao Z, Peng C, Zhou J, Jiang J (2016) High-throughput computational screening of 137953 metal–organic frameworks for membrane separation of a CO₂ /N₂ /CH₄ mixture. J Mater Chem A 4:15904–15912. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA06262HCrossRef

34.

Kancharlapalli S, Snurr RQ (2023) High-throughput screening of the CoRE-MOF-2019 database for CO₂ capture from wet flue gas: a multi-scale modeling strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:28084–28092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c04079CrossRefPubMed

35.

Mohamed SA, Zhao D, Jiang J (2023) Integrating stability metrics with high-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks for CO₂ capture. Commun Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-023-00409-9CrossRef

36.

Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Gong Q, Wang Z (2023) Graph transformer with convolution parallel networks for predicting single and binary component adsorption performance of metal-organic frameworks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:49527–49537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c10951CrossRefPubMed

37.

Zhang X, Zhang K, Lee Y (2020) Machine learning enabled tailor-made design of application-specific metal-organic frameworks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:734–743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b17867CrossRefPubMed

38.

Chung YG, Haldoupis E, Bucior BJ et al (2019) Advances, updates, and analytics for the computation-ready, experimental metal-organic framework database: CoRE MOF 2019. J Chem Eng Data 64:5985–5998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00835CrossRef

39.

Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS et al (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114:10024–10035. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00051a040CrossRef

40.

Addicoat MA, Vankova N, Akter IF, Heine T (2014) Extension of the universal force field to metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput 10:880–891. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400952tCrossRefPubMed

41.

Kancharlapalli S, Gopalan A, Haranczyk M, Snurr RQ (2021) Fast and accurate machine learning strategy for calculating partial atomic charges in metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput 17:3052–3064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01229CrossRefPubMed

42.

Limas NG, Manz TA (2018) Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 4. Efficient parallel computation of net atomic charges, atomic spin moments, bond orders, and more. RSC Adv 8:2678–2707. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA11829ECrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Limas NG, Manz TA (2016) Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 2. Computed results for a wide range of periodic and nonperiodic materials. RSC Adv 6:45727–45747. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA05507ACrossRef

44.

Manz TA, Limas NG (2016) Introducing DDEC6 atomic population analysis: part 1. Charge partitioning theory and methodology. RSC Adv 6:47771–47801. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA04656HCrossRef

45.

Potoff JJ, Siepmann JI (2001) Vapor–liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. AIChE J 47:1676–1682. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690470719CrossRef

46.

Horn HW, Swope WC, Pitera JW et al (2004) Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J Chem Phys 120:9665–9678. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1683075CrossRefPubMed

47.

Willems TF, Rycroft CH, Kazi M et al (2012) Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 149:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020CrossRef

48.

Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Ellis DE, Snurr RQ (2016) RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials. Mol Simul 42:81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2015.1010082CrossRef

49.

Matito-Martos I, Moghadam PZ, Li A et al (2018) Discovery of an optimal porous crystalline material for the capture of chemical warfare agents. Chem Mater 30:4571–4579. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00843CrossRef

50.

Pedregosa F. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python

51.

Liu S, Wang M, Wei S et al (2023) Enhanced CO₂ capture in partially interpenetrated MOFs: synergistic effects from functional group, pore size, and steric-hindrance. J Colloid Interface Sci 650:1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.058CrossRefPubMed

52.

Li S, Chung YG, Snurr RQ (2016) High-throughput screening of metal-organic frameworks for CO₂ capture in the presence of water. Langmuir 32:10368–10376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02803CrossRefPubMed

53.

Shang S, Yang C, Sun M et al (2022) CO₂ capture from wet flue gas using transition metal inserted porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks as efficient adsorbents. Sep Purif Technol 301:122058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122058CrossRef

54.

Lee K, Howe JD, Lin L-C et al (2015) Small-molecule adsorption in open-site metal-organic frameworks: a systematic density functional theory study for rational design. Chem Mater 27:668–678. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm502760qCrossRef

55.

Liu Y, Liu J, Lin YS, Chang M (2014) Effects of water vapor and trace gas impurities in flue gas on CO₂ /N₂ separation using ZIF-68. J Phys Chem C 118:6744–6751. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4113969CrossRef

Titel: Computational screening of metal–organic frameworks for separation of CO2 and N2 from wet flue gas
verfasst von: Chengxin Ji
Kang Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 16.05.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09744-9

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht