nach oben

Journal of Crop Health

Erschienen in:

24.10.2022 | Original Article / Originalbeitrag

Biological Control of Bean Halo Blight Disease (Pseudomonas Savastanoi Pv. Phaseolicola) with Antagonist Bacterial Strains

verfasst von: Mesude Figen Dönmez, Zübeyde Aliyeva

Erschienen in: Journal of Crop Health | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, the biological control of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. phaseolicola, which causes halo blight in bean plants, was investigated with bacterial strains isolated from different sources. Fifty-four isolated bacterial strains were identified by fatty acid methyl ester analysis. The nitrogen fixing, phosphorus, potassium and calcium dissolving properties of the strains were determined. It was determined that 11 strains belonging to the genera Bacillus alcalophilus, Bacillus atrophaeus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus subtilis, Lysinibacillus sphaericus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida genera were effective against the pathogen, and that these strains inhibited the development of Psp by forming an inhibition zone varying between 1.97–43.13 mm. It was determined that the application of the strains, that were found to be effective in in vivo testing, to the leaves as a spray, singly and in combination, decreased the development of the disease with an effect of 50.15–75.21% compared to the control group. The results revealed that antagonist bacteria were effective in inhibiting the pathogen growth and could be used in biological control of the disease.

Vorheriger Artikel Productivity and Profitability of Irrigated Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are Influenced by Irrigation Scheduling and Weed Management Approaches

Nächster Artikel Activity of Phosphites and Chitosan on Biochemical Responses and Target Spot Control in Cucumber Plants

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267CrossRef

Abo-Elyousr KA, Bagy HMK, Hashem M, Alamri SA, Mostafa YS (2019) Biological control of the tomato with caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis using formulated plant grow-promoting bacteria. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29(54):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0152-6CrossRef

Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2005) Indole Acetic Acid Production by the indigenous isolates of Azotobacter and Fluorescent Pseudomonas in the pserence and absence of tryptophan. Turk J Biol 29:29–34

Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163(2):173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001CrossRefPubMed

Almeida IMGD, Rodrigues LMR, Beriam LOS (2015) Xanthhomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans causing wilt symptoms in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Brazil. Arq Inst Biol 82:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000042013CrossRef

Alstrom S (1991) Induction of disease resistance in common bean susceptible to halo blight bacterial pathogen after seed bacterization with rhizosphere pseudomonads. J Gen Appl Microbiol 37(6):495–501. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.37.495CrossRef

Arsenijevic M, Obradovic A, Stevanovic D, Ivanovic M (1998) Antagonistic effect of some saprophytic bacteria to Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola and Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli. Bulletin OILB/SROP 21(9):297–300

Bais HP, Fall R, Vivanco JM (2004) Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol 134(1):307–319. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.028712CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Banerjee MR, Yesmin L, Vesse JK (2006) Handbook of microbial biofertilizers. In: Rai MK (ed) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers and biopesticides. Food Production Press, Binghamton

Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35:1044–1051CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Boudyach EH, Fatmi M, Akhayat O, Benizri E, Aoumar AAB (2001) Selection of antagonistic bacteria of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and evaluation of their efficiency against bacterial canker of tomato. Biocontrol Sci Technol 11:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150020029817CrossRef

Brown MF, Kinden DA (2005) Plant pathology. In: Agrios GN (ed) Plant diseased caused by prokaryotes: bacteria and mollicutes, 5th edn., pp 627–638

Çakmakçı R, Erdoğan Ü, Kotan R, Oral B, Dönmez F (2008) Çoruh vadisinde yabani ahududu rizosfer topraklarında heterotrof azot fikseri bakteri çeşitliliği. In: Türkiye 4. Ulusal Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi, 8–10 Ekim, Konya

Cattelan AJ, Hartel PG, Fuhrmann JJ (1999) Screening for plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(6):1670–1680. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361670xCrossRef

Corrêa BO, Soares VN, Sangiogo M, de Oliveira JERE, Moura AEB (2017) Interaction between bacterial biocontrol-agents and strains of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli effects on biocontrol efficacy of common blight in beans. Afr J Microbiol Res 11(32):1294–1302. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2017.8565CrossRef

Da Costa PB, Beneduzi A, de Souza R, Schoenfeld R, Vargas LK, Passaglia LM (2013) The effects of different fertilization conditions on bacterial plant growth promoting traits: Guidelines for directed bacterial prospection and testing. Plant Soil 368:267–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1513-zCrossRef

De Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ (1997) Phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but no phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fertil Soils 24:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050258CrossRef

De Souza R, Beneduzi A, Ambrosin A, Da Costa PB, Meye J, Vargas LK, Passaglia LM (2013) The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped in southern Brazilian fields. Plant Soil 366:585–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1430-1CrossRef

Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y (2003) Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22(2):107–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/713610853CrossRef

Döbereiner J (1989) Isolation and identification of root associated diazotrophs. In: Skinner FA, Boddey RM, Fendrik I (eds) Nitrogen fixation with non-legumes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 103–108CrossRef

Duman K, Soylu S (2019) Characterization of antagonistic and plant growth-promoting traits of endophytic bacteria isolated from bean plants against Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. Plant Prot Bull 59(3):59–69. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.597214CrossRef

Farina R, Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, de Campos SB, Lisboa BB, Wendisch V, Passaglia LM (2012) Diversity of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria communities associated with the stages of canola growth. Appl Soil Ecol 55:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.12.011CrossRef

Fitzpatrick CR, Salas-González I, Conway JM, Finkel OM, Gilbert S, Russ D, Dangl JL (2020) The plant microbiome: from ecology to reductionism and beyond. Annu Rev Microbiol 74:81–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-022620-014327CrossRefPubMed

Fourie D (2002) Distribution and severity of bacterial diseases on dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in South Africa. J Phytopathol 150:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2002.00745.xCrossRef

Giorgio A, Cantore PL, Shanmugaiah V, Lamorte D, Iacobellis NS (2016) Rhizobacteria isolated from common bean in southern Italy as potential biocontrol agents against common bacterial blight. Eur J Plant Pathol 144:297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0767-8CrossRef

Granada C, Da Costa PB, Lisboa BB, Vargas LK, Passaglia LM (2013) Comparison among bacterial communities present in arenized and adjacent areas subjected to different soil management regimes. Plant Soil 373:339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1796-8CrossRef

Guetsky R, Shtienberg D, Elad Y, Fischer E, Dinoor A (2002) Improving biological control by combining biocontrol agents each with several mechanisms of disease suppression. Phytopathology 92:976–985. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.9.976CrossRefPubMed

Gupta S, Kaushal R (2017) Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria; Bioresouce for enhanced productivity of Solanaceous vegetable crops. Acta Sci Agric 1(3):10–15

Haas DA, Defago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1129CrossRefPubMed

Han HS, Lee KD (2005) Phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria effect on mineral uptake, soil availability and growth of eggplant. Res J Agric Biol Sci 1(2):176–180

Hu J, Wei Z, Friman VP, Gu SH, Wang XF, Eisenhauer N, Jousset A (2016) Probiotic diversity enhances rhizosphere microbiome function and plant disease suppression. mBio 7(1):e01790–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01790-16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Katherman MJ, Wilkinson RE, Beer SV (1980) Resistance and seed infection in three dry bean cultivars exposed to a halo blight epidemic. Plant Dis 64:857–859CrossRef

Klement Z, Rudolph K, Sands D (1964) Hypersensitive reaction induced by phytopathogenic bacteria ın the tobacco leaf. Phytopathology 54:474–477

Laird M, Piccoli D, Weselowski B, McDowell T, Renaud J, MacDonald J, Yuan ZC (2020) Surfactin-producing Bacillus velezensis 1B-23 and Bacillus sp. 1D-12 protect tomato against bacterial canker caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. J Plant Pathol 102:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-019-00461-wCrossRef

Lanteigne C, Gadkar VJ, Wallon T, Novinscak A, Filion M (2012) Production of DAPG and HCN by Pseudomonas sp. LBUM300 contributes to the biological control of bacterial canker of tomato. Phytopathology 102(10):967–973. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-11-11-0312CrossRefPubMed

Larkin RP, Fravel DR (1998) Efficacy of various fungal and bacterial biocontrol organisms for control of Fusarium wilt of tomato. Plant Dis 82(9):1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.9.1022CrossRefPubMed

Liu K, McInroy JA, Hu CH, Kloepper JW (2018) Mixtures of plantgrowth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple plant diseases and plant-growth promotion in the presence of pathogens. Plant Dis 102(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0478-RECrossRefPubMed

Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ann Revi Microbiol 63:541–556CrossRef

Mehta S, Nautiyal CS (2001) An efficient method for qualitatiue screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Curr Microbiol 43:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002840010259CrossRefPubMed

Mokrani S, Rai A, Belabid L, Cherif A, Cherif H, Mahjoubi M, Nabti E (2019) Pseudomonas diversity in western Algeria: role in the stimulation of bean germination and common bean blight biocontrol. Eur J Plant Pathol 153:397–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1566-9CrossRef

Mora I, Cabrefiga J, Montesinos E (2015) Cyclic lipopeptide biosynthetic genes and products, and inhibitory activity of plant-associated Bacillus against phytopathogenic bacteria. PLoS ONE 10(5):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127738CrossRef

Nagarajkumar M, Bhaskaran R, Velazhahan R (2004) Involvement of secondary metabolites and extracellular lytic enzymes produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens in inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani, the rice sheath blight pathogen. Microbiol Res 159(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2004.01.005CrossRefPubMed

Ola AR, Thomy D, Lai D, Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Proksch P (2013) Inducing secondary metabolite production by the endophytic fungus Fusarium tricinctum through coculture with Bacillus subtilis. J Nat Prod 76(11):2094–2099. https://doi.org/10.1021/np400589hCrossRefPubMed

Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16(3):115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009CrossRefPubMed

Parmar P, Sindhu SS (2013) Potassium solubilisation by rizosphare bacteria : In fluence of nutritional and environmental conditions. J Microbiol Res 3(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.microbiology.20130301.04CrossRef

Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(89):3795–3801. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.3795-3801.2002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Penrose DM, Moffatt BA, Glick BR (2001) Determination of 1‑aminocycopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) to assess the effects of ACC deaminase-containing bacteria on roots of canola seedlings. Can J Microbiol 47(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.1139/w00-128CrossRefPubMed

Piggot PJ, Hilbert DW (2004) Sporulation of Bacillus subtilis. Curr Opin Microbiol 7(6):579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.001CrossRefPubMed

Sangiogo M, Rodriguez DP, Moccellin R, Bermudez JMM, Corrêa BO, Moura AB (2018) Foliar spraying with bacterial biocontrol agents for the control of common bacterial blight of bean. Pesq Agropec Bras 53:1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2018001000003CrossRef

Sasser M (1990) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI technical note, vol 101, pp 1–6

Saygılı H, Şahin F, Aysan Y (2006) Fitobakteriyoloji. Meta Basım Matbaacılık, İzmir

Segev E, Wyche TP, Kim KH, Petersen J, Ellebrandt C, Vlamakis H, Kolter R (2016) Dynamic metabolic exchange governs a marine algal-bacterial interaction. ELife 5:e17473. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17473.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Soylu S, Kara M, Üremiş İ, Kurt Ş, Soylu EM, Uysal A (2018) Determination of plant growth promoting traits of bacterial endophytes isolated and identified from invasive plant water Hyacinth eichornia crassipes in Orontes river of Turkey. In: International Mediterranean Symposium 01–03 November, Mersin/Turkey

Townsend GK, Heuberger JW (1943) Methods for estimating losses caused by diseases in fungicide experiment. Plant Dis Rep 27:340–343

Varhan R (2019) Maydanoz bakteriyel yaprak leke hastalığı etmeni Pseudomonas syringae pv. apii ile biyolojik mücadelede antagonist bakterilerin kullanım olanaklarının araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi

Völksch B, May R (2001) Biological control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea by epiphytic bacteria under field conditions. Microb Ecol 41(2):132–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002480000078CrossRefPubMed

Wahyudi AT, Astuti RP, Widyawati A, Mery A, Nawangsih AA (2011) Characterization of Bacillus sp. strains isolated from rhizosphere of soybean plants for their use as potential plant growth for promoting rhizobacteria. J Microbiol Antimicrob 3(2):34–40. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMA.9000020CrossRef

Watanabe M, Suzuki A, Komori S, Bessho H (2004) Comparison of endogenous IAA and cytokinins in shoots of columnar and normal type apple trees. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 73:19–24. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.73.19CrossRef

Yigit F, Dikilitas M (2007) Control fusarium wilt of tomato by combination of flourescent Pseudomonas, non-pathogen Fusarium and Trichoderma harzianum T‑22 in greenhouse conditions. Plant Pathol J 6(2):159–163CrossRef

Yılmaz S, Dönmez MF, Çoruh İ (2020) Farklı lokasyonlarda yetişen yabani bitki türlerinden izole edilen bakterilerin tanısı ve azot fikse etme, fosfor, potasyum ve kalsiyum çözme özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. J Agric 3(2):71–90. https://doi.org/10.46876/ja.825647CrossRef

Zhao H, Shao D, Jiang C, Shi J, Li Q, Huang Q, Jin M (2017) Biological activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(15):5951–5960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8396-0CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Biological Control of Bean Halo Blight Disease (Pseudomonas Savastanoi Pv. Phaseolicola) with Antagonist Bacterial Strains
verfasst von: Mesude Figen Dönmez
Zübeyde Aliyeva
Publikationsdatum: 24.10.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Crop Health / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 2948-264X
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2658
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00746-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Biofertilizer Role in Alleviating the Deleterious Effects of Salinity on Wheat Growth and Productivity

Mitigation Effects of Melatonin Applied to Cauliflower Seedlings Under Different Flooding Durations

Effect of Carbon Nanoparticles in Biochar and Sulphur as a Foliar Spray on Onion Plants: A New Orientation

Can Seed Priming with Seaweed Extract Neutralize the Effects of Salinity on New Red Fire Leafy Lettuce Characteristics?

How Can Salicylic Acid and 24-epibrassinolide Improve Productivity and Oil Quantity and Quality of Black Mustard Under Salt Stress?

Assessment of Tribenuron Methyl Soil Residual on Crops Germination Properties